Nanoprobe Network

An interactive, international virtual community dedicated to the science and technology of nano and bio scanning probes

Advanced Search

Calculation of the deflection of a cantilever during scanning using a contact mode AFM
  • Huabin December 2010
    Thank you very much for your instructive answers! Unfortunately, we don’t have such a signal access module. I am thinking about using the following method to calculate the deflection of the cantilever: (1) Calculate the Delta set-point, i.e., using the engagement set-point to subtract the VERT signal of the photo diode when the cantilever is just off the surface; (2) Add the value calculated from (1) to the deflection data (error signal). Does this make sense?

    On the other hand, I am also using an MFP-3D Asylum AFM to do some experiments. I found some discussions regarding the calculation of true deflection (load) of a cantilever during scanning from a forum supported by Asylum Research. Briefly, some guys suggested that the actual deflection value (V) could be calculated by using the data (V) of a defection image to subtract the non-contact value (baseline, V) of a force curve that was collected immediately upon completing the collection of the deflection image. If this is true, it should be convenient for friction measurement.
  • mbrukman January 2011
    In an NS-IV, you might be best off taking force-distance curves immediately before and after your friction images. Use the "before" plot to run the Setpoint Zero function, then apply your normal force with the knowledge of what PSD output corresponds to zero load. Afterwards, take an FD to see how much you've drifted. At the very least, that will put bounds on your normal force uncertainty.

    You don't need a breakout box to ramp the setpoint in the MFP-3D. I worked with AR to write a couple lines of code to change the SP on a line-by-line basis during an image. Unfortunately it's been a while since I've done this and the exact details escape me. But my discussions with Bemis et al are still up there on the AR forum. I'm sure the code is there too.
  • Huabin January 2011
    Many thanks! Yes, I have noticed the code last year and already used it in my experiments. Here, I would like to mention that the calculation of the normal load stated in the AR forum (see above) is incorrect, and I have discussed it with Bemis recently.

  • Nano/Bio Interface Center
    University of Pennsylvania
    3231 Walnut St
    Room 112, LRSM Building
    Philadelphia, PA 19104-6272

    telephone: 215-746-3210
    Fax: 215-746-3204

Copyright © 2009 Nanoprobe Network. All rights reserved.
site design: ternstyle.us